#phonar | task1 | “It just ain’t nachural, I tells ya.”

I spent a little bit of time this morning completing my first task for #phonar. Details can be found in a previous blog post.

Below is the copy I wrote for the spread. It’s a wee bit heavy handed, but it’s better than lorem ipsum. Also, I proofed as best I could… full refund if not satisfied.

IT JUST AIN’T NACHURAL, I TELL YA.
IT AIN’T RIGHT

WILLIAM MORTENSEN, WEEGEE, DIANE ARBUS, AND
THE ANONYMOUS PHOTOGRAPHERS OF LOW-END NUDIES

Written and Edited by Kevin I. Slaughter

The styles and processes couldn’t be more different. The motivations varied from a desperate bid to make quick cash to cultivating a truly unique and painstaking artistic vision. And yet, there is something familiar in all of these photographs, something most people don’t want to see.

People often have a visceral response to these images. They often evoke one of our strongest instincts – disgust. We see the “other”, the thing outside of ourselves that we want to keep away. From ugliness to retardation, from morbidity to degeneration.

And yet, we look. Maybe after some initial reflexive response, where we turn away or close our eyes, but we still look and often stare.

Possibly an evolutionary response, knowing one’s enemy.  A gazelle will watch the cheetah, because if the cheetah comes to close, it means death. The same can be said about degeneracy, though in a more abstract way.

It is natural to hate and fear the “other”. People deny this aspect of nature because they want nature to behave how they think it should, instead of how it is.

It is also natural to fool one’s self, to live a lie that what you have is good, even when it’s flawed or ugly or broken. Objectivity is always elusive in the human mind, and being presented with an uncomfortable objective truth sparks an irrational mental war on that truth.

There is a constant struggle in the public sphere to take control of “nature”, of what it means. A constant push of this priest or that politician to couch their beliefs into a frame that is on the side of nature, be it one that “god” created, or one that evolved.

The one objective truth about nature that we know is that it works completely independently from our wants and needs. What is good, or right, or beautiful has nothing whatsoever to do with what can and will occur.
Nature is what is.

Book Nerd :: Mortensen, Kalb, Farrell, Gibson, Parker

Another sideways photo from the phone. I’m not sure why it does that…

image“William Mortensen, a Revival” – far too FEW plates of his work in this, the only collection published in decades. I’ve waited to buy it for some time, but that meant the expectations were high. There are some nice images, including a beautiful full color image of “The Tantric Sorcerer” from the 1930s. But then they take up a whole second page with his black and white version! Also, the fact that most of the writing is obsessed with gossiping about his sexual life and the “homoeroticism” of his work makes me think they’re really trying to appease the gays that run the art world. Yeah, enough of that.

“The Tyranny of Liberalism” by James Kalb. He’s a contributor to AltRight (that’s how I know his work). I’m having a hard time getting into this one, to be honest. I want to give it another whack at some point.

“The Myth of Male Power” by William P. Farrell. I’ve seen this so many times on The Spearhead, when I saw a used copy I picked it up. His talk at CATO is good. There’s one quote that echos something that I’ve been screaming for years: “It would be hard to find a single example in history in which a group that cast more than 50 percent of the vote got away with calling itself the victim.

“The Master Magicians” by Walter Gibson – Prestidigitation, not thaumaturgy. Bought it used, blind. Might be good, might not get to it.

“Not So Deep as a Well” by Dorothy Parker – a poorly kept copy of this collection of poems. I love that there is a page between the table of contents and the poems that has a large decorative element and the words “ENOUGH ROPE”. I have very few volumes of poetry, but I like DP. I’ll set it in the bathroom. There was a bookplate in this copy that has since been (almost entirely) removed. I’m torn about bookplates. I love the idea of an ex libris, and own a book about them, but it would just seem ridiculous to have my own made to paste into my own ragtag collection. When books were rarer, it made more sense, it seems. When you built a library of hardbound books, instead of a mishmash of mass-market paperbacks, trade paperbacks, oversized low-brow art books, etc.

William Mortensen / YouTube Help Needed

Is there anyone with the time and ability who would be willing to splice audio and still images together into 10 minute videos to post on YouTube? I want to get some 2-10 minute excerpts of interviews from the UA Variety Hour podcast up but I can’t take all that on in addition to everything else. I would provide the segments already cut down and still images, you’d need to be able to edit them together and output a clean playing video, minimal effects, and uploaded directly to the account.

You can see what I’ve done recently, here:

Some prior experience needed, if you’ve got some work already on YouTube, send me a link via the contact page. You should be able to work with PSD files with transparencies.

No hard deadlines, 6 or so segments to start, one or two videos a month at most.

Nevermind, it’s getting done.

Continue reading