Anachronistic Expletives…

The list below was compiled by Blanche Barton and Anton LaVey and published in The Cloven Hoof, Issue 129 (1997). I’m not posting the introductory and explanatory text, as I feel that would be a breech of copyright (I’m not sure the list below does that, and it is not my intention). I do think it’s a marvelous display of (almost all) Americanisms, though, many

“FOR THE LOVE OF MIKE!”
“ZOUNDS!”
“FOR PETE’S SAKE!”
“GADZOOKS!”
“FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!”
“CRIMINETLES!”
“LEAPING LIZARDS!”
“PISH! TOSH!”
“HELL’S BELLS!”
“SUFFERING SUCCOTASH!”
“CHEESE AND CRACKERS… (GOT ALL MUDDY!)”
“LAND’S SAKES!”
“ME OH MY!”
“WELL, BLOW ME DOWN!”
“WHAT THE HEY!”
“SON OF A GUN!”
“HAIL COLUMBIA!”
“WELL, I SWAN! ”
“SON OF A BEE HIVE!”
“SWEAR TO GOD!”
“HOT DOG!”
“GOL DANG IT!”
“I’LL BE BUTTERED!”
“GOSH DARN IT!”
“WHAT IN BLUE BLAZES!”
“DAG NAB IT!”
“WHAT THE SAM HILL!”
“DOGGONE IT!”
“WHAT THE DEUCE!”
“I’LL BE DOGGONED!”
“DOG MY CATS!”
“JIMINY CRICKETS!”
“GOOD GRIEF!”
“SHOOT!”
“HOLY cow!”
“FIDDLESTICKS!”
“BY GOLLY!”
“I’LL BE A MONKEY’S UNCLE!”
“GRIPES!”
“EGADS!”
“JEEZ!”
“YOU’RE FULL OF PRUNES!”
“BY GOLLY!”
“NONE OF YOUR BEESWAX!”
“BY GUM!”
“FOR CRIMINY SAKES!”
“BY JUPITER!”
“SHUCKS!”
“OMIGOSH!”
“WHAT THE (HECK!)”
“EXCUSE MY DUST!”
“DON’T STOP NOW!”
“BY HECK!”
“THIS’LL KILL YA!”
“YOU DON’T SAY!”
“OH, FUDGE!”
“GOOD GRIEF!”
“H-E-DOUBLE TOOTHPICKS!”
“GOOD HEAVENS!”
“LAND SAKES!”
“GO TO BLAZES!”
“SAKES ALIVE!”
“HEAVENS TO BETSY!”
“WELL, I’LL BE!”
“JUMPING JEHOSEPHAT!”
“GREAT SCOTT!”
“LORD LOVE A DUCK!”
“GREAT BALLS OF FIRE!”
“HOLY MOLEY!”
“GLORIOSKI!”
“SAINTS PRESERVE US!”
“LAND O GOSHEN!”
“GOOD GRAVY!”
“TARNATION!”
“CONSARN
“SHIVER ME TIMBERS!”
“YUMPING YIMMINY!”
“OY, VEH IZ MIR!”
“IF DAT DON’T TAKE DE CAKE!”
“SHUT MY MOUTH!”
“YIKES!”
“MAMA MIA!”
“THE CAT’S PAJAMAS!”
“THE MONKEY’S INSTEP!”
“S.O.B!”
“SON OF A SEA COOK!”
“SON OF A BISCUIT!”
“PSHAW!”
“BUSHWA!”
“ZUT ALORS!”
“AW, NERTZ!”
“OH, NUTS!”
“GOLLY!”
“GOLLY GEE!”
“HOLY MOSES!”
“BY JOVE!”
“GOSH ALMIGHTY!”
“GOODNESS GRACIOUS!”
“GOOD GRAVY!”
“BY GEORGE!”
“GREAT GUNS!”
“HOLY CATS!”
“CONFOUND IT!”
“GEE WHILLIKERS!”
“GEE WHIZ!”
“GODFREY DANIEL!”
“CUT IT OUT…YOU’RE
KILLIN’ ME!”
“GOOD HEAVENS!”
“HOLY SMOKE!”
“BY CRACKY!”
“MY STARS!”
“JUDAS PRIEST!”
“BLESS MY SOUL!”
“UPON MY WORD!”
“THE CAT’S MEOW!”
“JIMINY CHRISTMAS!”
“BLIMEY!”
“HONEST INJUN!”
“CARAMBA!”
“I’LL BE A DIRTY
SO AND SO!”
“I’LL BE DARNED!”
“HOW D’YE LIKE THAT!”
“WHADDA YA KNOW ABOUT THAT!”
“GIMME A BREAK!”
“HANG IT ALL!”
“AIN’T IT THE TRUTH!”
“SHADRACK, MESACH, AND A BILLY GOAT!”
“THREE CHEERS & A TIGER!”
“AW, FIGS!”
“FAN MY BROW!”
“TAN MY HIDE!”
“GREAT DAY IN THE MORNING!”
“GLORY BE!”
“HOLY MACKEREL!”
“HEAVENLY DAYS!”
“STUFF AND NONSENSE!”
“MY ACHING BACK!”
“FOR PITY’S SAKES!”
“WHADDA YA GONNA DO!”
“THAT’S TELLING ‘EM
“WELL, STRIKE ME PINK!”
“YOU DON’T SAY!”
“SEZ YOU!”
“SO’S YOUR OLD MAN!”
“YOUR MUDDER WEARS ARMY SHOES!”
“GO CHASE YOURSELF!”

FOREWORD – M’lle New York

What follows is found on the first page of the first issue of Vance Thompson and James Huneker’s M’lle New York magazine, in 1895. It is a glorious tirade of elitism against the “public”. I stumbled across V.T. while researching Max Stirner, who would certainly be an influence on Thompson (and Huneker!) a few years after the following was written.

My own Egoism tends to a type of elitism, rather than communitarian ideals, though some people tie their individualistic horse to the proverbial trough of humanity. I think it’s rather fetid water.

Wikipedia informs us:

From 1895 to 1899, (Vance Thompson) co-edited the periodical M’lle New York with Huneker. Described as “a highly idiosyncratic blend of serious analyses and presentations of European Symbolist literature and thought with buffoonery and incessant anti-philistinism”, it quickly became a manifesto for their cultural ideals.

In the following, Vance does not attack the poor, he slanders the UNDIFFERENTIATED mass. He set his journal to celebrate stratification, by scorning egalitarianism


 

FOREWORD

The mob—that glorious clientage of Shakespeare—is dead; it has become the “public.” It is not merely a juggle of words. This change goes to the root of things. Once the poet and the mob wrought together. Oh. this divine mob of the early centuries! It had a fine force of instinct; it was ignorant and it avowed it; and by this very avowal it attained a high state of intellectual receptivity and appreciation. The mob and Peter the Hermit made the crusades; the mob and Luther the Reformation; the mob and Shakespeare made the drama, as the mob and Villon made the French language—but the mob has become the public and the poet is its lickspittle. Poets? They are the helots—many of them the drunken helots—of the magazines. The public—

The public is made up of individuals who have opinions—they even pronounce opinions; they read the newspapers; they have a sullen and irreconcilable hate for the extraordinary; they believe in philanthropy (the most selfish of vices) and in education (the monstrous fetich of this thoughtless century): there are millions of them; they walk beneath the eternal stars and fondle each other; they are given in marriage and taken in adultery they beget children; they read the newspapers; they have opinions; they are the public. The public—

It corrupts the language it has inherited from the mob and the poets; it has debauched the stage to the level of Mr. Richard Watson Gilder’s poetry and looks upon the drama merely as a help to digestion, a peptic or aperiative; not content with having vulgarized literature and arts, it has begun to “popularize” science—your boot-maker has theories of the creation and your tailor argues the existence of God; counter jumpers play at atheism; lawyers and pedagogues are Mattered at reading in the Astor Library that Moses was only a “medicine man” and Christ a politician. The public—

This grotesque aggregation of foolish individuals pretends to literary taste; it has its painters, its playwrights, its authors; that part of it which reads the male blue-stocking, William Dean Howells, looks down upon that part of it which reads the female blue-stocking, Richard Harding Davis; that part which reads Richard Harding Davis looks down upon the part which reads Laura Jean Libby (why, in Heaven’s name?), and the readers of Miss Libby look down in turn upon the readers of the Police Gazette.

M’lle New York is not concerned with the public. Her only ambition is to disintegrate some small portion of the public into its original component parts—the aristocracies of birth, wit, learning and art and the joyously vulgar mob.

9.

Long slept Zarathustra; and not only the rosy dawn passed over his head, but also the morning. At last, however, his eyes opened, and amazedly he gazed into the forest and the stillness, amazedly he gazed into himself. Then he arose quickly, like a seafarer who all at once seeth the land; and he shouted for joy: for he saw a new truth. And he spake thus to his heart:

A light hath dawned upon me: I need companions – living ones; not dead companions and corpses, which I carry with me where I will.

But I need living companions, who will follow me because they want to follow themselves – and to the place where I will. A light hath dawned upon me. Not to the people is Zarathustra to speak, but to companions! Zarathustra shall not be the herd’s herdsman and hound!

To allure many from the herd – for that purpose have I come. The people and the herd must be angry with me: a robber shall Zarathustra be called by the herdsmen.

Herdsmen, I say, but they call themselves the good and just. Herdsmen, I say, but they call themselves the believers in the orthodox belief.

Behold the good and just! Whom do they hate most? Him who breaketh up their tables of values, the breaker, the lawbreaker: – he, however, is the creator.

Behold the believers of all beliefs! Whom do they hate most? Him who breaketh up their tables of values, the breaker, the law-breaker – he, however, is the creator.

Companions, the creator seeketh, not corpses – and not herds or believers either. Fellow-creators the creator seeketh – those who grave new values on new tables.

Companions, the creator seeketh, and fellow-reapers: for everything is ripe for the harvest with him. But he lacketh the hundred sickles: so he plucketh the ears of corn and is vexed.

Companions, the creator seeketh, and such as know how to whet their sickles. Destroyers, will they be called, and despisers of good and evil. But they are the reapers and rejoicers.

Fellow-creators, Zarathustra seeketh; fellow-reapers and fellow-rejoicers, Zarathustra seeketh: what hath he to do with herds and herdsmen and corpses!

And thou, my first companion, rest in peace! Well have I buried thee in thy hollow tree; well have I hid thee from the wolves.

But I part from thee; the time hath arrived. ‘Twixt rosy dawn and rosy dawn there came unto me a new truth.

I am not to be a herdsman, I am not to be a grave-digger. Not any more will I discourse unto the people; for the last time have I spoken unto the dead.

With the creators, the reapers, and the rejoicers will I associate: the rainbow will I show them, and all the stairs to the Superman.

To the lone-dwellers will I sing my song, and to the twain-dwellers; and unto him who hath still ears for the unheard, will I make the heart heavy with my happiness.

I make for my goal, I follow my course; over the loitering and tardy will I leap. Thus let my on-going be their down-going!

Aeschylus at Marathon. Are we Saved by Love or by Hate?

Aeschylus at Marathon.
Are we Saved by Love or by Hate ?

Once for all, let us clear our minds of cant. Let us rise to the noble honesty of the Greek attitude which faithfully reflected the sanity and the sanctity of Hate. Can we find a more faithful or more inspiring embodiment of this noble pagan position than in the beautiful, hate-breathing epitaph which Aeschylus wrote for himself? Here it is:

Athenian Aeschylus, Euphorion’s son,
Buried in Geta’s fields these lines declare ;
His deeds are registered at Marathon,
Known to the deep-haired Mede, who met him there.

We wish to offer a few observations on one phase of the opinions elicited by our Symposium. We desire to reason in the most patient manner possible with the most misguided beings who have ever obstructed human progress, we mean the well-meaning but deluded Tolstoyans. The Tolstoyans tell us that Love is the only remedy for social misery When the Tolstoyan stands before the victim of oppression and outrage, it is thus that he addresses the suffering man: “It is true that the oppressor has robbed you not only of the chance of a decent existence, but has condemned your wife to life-long starvation and your daughters to prostitution; nevertheless you are still more blessed than your murderer and exploiter because you have done no evil; and you must still love the instrument of your afflictions. You are far more prosperous than he is, although you are in this sorry light, because you have the approval of your conscience even while you are starving, and if you continue to love.him till you starve to death, you will be numbered with.the saints: in glory everlasting.” When the Tolstoyans, mock our miseries with such precious consolations (for I have but reduced their doctrines to their logical, conclusion) I am compelled to say to them that it is such unutterable imbecilities as these which drive us to despair of humanity. Against such stupidities omnipotence itself must contend in vain. While’ these, insanities meet us at every turn, progress, is all but impossible—our perpetual damnation is the only thing of which we can be certain. Tolstoyans tell us that social syncope exists because men do not love enough. We believe in the antithesis of this statement—we believe that, so far.as, it is not inherent in human nature, social misery exists because men do not hate enough. Love rarely inspires thought, and indeed its apostles tell us that with love no thought is necessary, that love is a substitute for thought. No apostle of Hate has ever talked such nonsense—it has never been alleged that Hate is- a substitute for thought, but we have abundant proof that profound hatred has inspired some of the most impressive streams-of thought, some of the most powerful intellects ‘of all time. Karl Marx, quoting George Sand, declares “On the eve bleach general reconstruction of society, the last word, of social science will ever be

“Combat or death ; bloody struggle or extinction,
“It is thus that the question is irresistibly put.”

H. M. Hyndman wrote: “It is precisely the hatred and disgust I feel for the misery, degradation and physical deterioration around me which had more influence in making and keeping me a Social Democrat than anything else.” William Morris, writing on “How I Became a Socialist,” says: “To sum up then, the study of history and the love and practice of art forced me into a hatred of [the existing] civilisation.”

In a world whose characteristics were prevailingly “lovely,” love would best become a man, but in a world whose leading features are to the last degree unlovely, hypocritical and hateful, hate is the only sentiment an honest man can entertain. Hence it follows that in this predominantly hateful world, men of hate leave their impress on every page of history, while men of love, with their pale and ineffectual negations, have their day and cease to be. Hannibal, Napoleon, Nelson, Danton, Mirabea, Byron, Attilla, Morris, Marx, Proudhon— these names stand as sublime coefficients of vast streams of Hate.

What are the greatest events in modern history, its most inspiring episodes? They are: Tell, Hampden, Milton, or Cromwell, hating and resisting the tyrant to the death; Nelson’s exploits with his middies, inspired to glorious deeds by their hatred of Napoleon and the French; Napoleon’s achievements with his Grenadiers, whose inspiring motive was hatred, first, of their own aristocracy, and then of the enemies of the Eagle Paris razing the Bastille, France liquidating eight centuries of misery, Patrick Henry exclaiming “If this be treason make the most of it”; the embattled farmers firing at the Bridge of Concord (Discord) rather the shot heard round the world, the shot of which Emerson wrote: “Their deed of blood all mankind praise, Even the serene reason says, It was well “done”; Victor Hugo pouring the vials of his hate upon Napoleon the Little. These are the inspirations of Hate and they are among the noblest chapters of human history.

The great Haters are the great Lovers. Love Which does not hate the hateful as prpfoundly as it loves the lovely is mere hyprocrisy. Let us seriously ask the question, Do the predominant characteristics of the present age attract or repel an honest soul—in- other words, is our present age hateful or the reverse? We ought to base our answer upon the opinions of those whose honesty, capacity and experience entitle them to pronounce judg- ment on this issue. We present a series of such opinions in the sonde VIA HELLOROSA (see below). Those whom we have quoted are not journalists, statesmen, or Doctors of Divinity—but perhaps are not less trustworthy on that account. We believe that a consideration of the unbought opinions of Hugo, Heine, Lemennais, etc., will convince any free mind that-the world has now reached the most murderous, most hypocritical, most hateful stage of social evolution known to history.- Shall we love or shall We hate this horrible epoch which has been cursed by the united execrations of Heine, Hugo, Marx, Proudhon, Nietzsche, Shaw, Tucker, Morris, Redbeard, and Wallace? Surely, not to hate in the profoundest possible manner, such an era, which presents an apotheosis of legitimised assassination and worshipped hypocrisy) is to confess oneself a defender of assassins and a devotee of prostitutes and pirates. When one considers the systematic slaughter of the young and helpless, when one ponders the malign influence of our boasted institutions upon thousands of young men and young women, robbing them, as it does, of their unreturning May time and condemning them to lives of unescapable ignorance, bitterness and vice, institutions which murder thousands to give to a few, luxuries as maleficent as the evils they rest upon, when one has circumnavigated this continent and sub-continent of misery, then one asks oneself the question, How can I sufficiently bate and curse this frightful epoch with which I am fatally contemporaneous?

Let us then, like Aeschylus of old, go forth to meet the Mede which threatens the self-realisation of the Free, with a spirit of Hate as unalterable as his own laws, and in a mariner that he will be able to appreciate. If time permit, let us give our enemy a decent burial on the field of our vindication, and if time do not permit we shall leave the dead to bury their dead. But on our field of Marathon we shall erect, with due libations, a trophy of accomplished Hate and Love—of Love for ourselves and our own, of Hate for all that threatens us and ours.

JOAN ERWIN MCCALL, Founder of the Religion of Hate.

WORD NERD :: my first urban dictionary definition :: offenditarian

UPDATE: A perfect example of the offenditarian at work: http://www.vdare.com/articles/the-coming-church-state-wars

… I was asked… what should be done about Muslim students at Catholic University demanding that the school provide them with prayer rooms, from which crucifixes and all other Catholic symbols that they found offensive had been removed.
After a nanosecond I replied, “Kick ’em out!”

Looking further into the matter, that was a rush to judgment.
For it seems that not a single Muslim student at CUA had gone to the District of Columbia Office of Human Rights to file a complaint.
That complaint was the work of John Banzhaf, a professor at GW, perennial litigant, and longtime contender for the title of National Pest.
In provocative language, Banzhaf told Fox News,
“It shouldn’t be too difficult to set aside a small room where Muslims can pray without having to stare up and be looked down upon by a cross of Jesus.
“They do have to pray five times a day, and to be sitting there trying to do Muslim prayers with a big cross looking down or a picture or Jesus or a picture of the pope is not very conducive to their religion.”

ORIG. POST BELOW

Thanks for your definition of offenditarian!

Editors reviewed your entry and have decided to publish it on urbandictionary.com.

It should appear on this page in the next few days:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=offenditarian

Urban Dictionary

—–

offenditarian

A portmanteau of “offended” and “humanitarian”. It describes someone who has made a lifestyle out of finding deep offense in most any situation. Usually offense is found “on behalf” of other people who represent a definable group that the offenditarian themselves are clearly not a part of.
This is usually to make a display of “solidarity”, an important word in the lexicon of offenditarians.
There is a strict hierarchy of human value, with handicapable African American lesbian female gendered womyn taking the top spot, and white cysgendered males being “worth” only 1/16th of the former.
The irony of offenditarianism is that if one becomes offended on behalf of someone higher on the value scale, the person higher up can use that to then become offended by the “patronizing,” “colonialist” mindset of the offenditarian.

“Why is that girl running down the street and screaming at the ice cream truck?”
“The driver is wearing all white, a trademark outfit of early 20th Century eugenicists.”
“Is the ice cream man a eugenicist?”
“No, but the girl is afraid someone might think he is, she is an offenditarian.”

Response from Massimo Introvigne

I will be writing a blog on Breivik and the misinformation of connecting him to the Church of Satan as an organization. Until then, I have recieved permission to post Dr. Introvigne‘s response to my previous letter.

Response from Massimo Introvigne:

Thank you for your comments. If you are in contact with (inter alia) Jim Lewis, he can easily confirm to you that in all my publications (including a 600-page manual of Satanism used in a number of Italian and French universities) I have never indulged in slander or defamation of the Church of Satan – my quarrels have been mostly with anti-cultists and moral entrepeneurs promoting moral panics about Satanism.. My text was posted a few hours before your postings at http://www.cesnur.org/2011/mi-oslo-en.html and may have included some factual mistakes I will be glad to correct.

These comments are:
1) “was first made publicly available on the Internet by Kevin Slaughter, an ordained minister in Anton LaVey (1930-1997)’s Church of Satan which, by the way, has a sizeable following in Norway” which I will change into “was first made largely available on the Internet by Kevin Slaughter, who found it on Stormfront.org, a white supremacist forum. Slaughter is an ordained minister in Anton LaVey (1930-1997)’s Church of Satan which, by the way, has a sizeable following in Norway”

2) “In a way, it is not surprising that Breivik had friends even in LaVey’s Church of Satan. The latter became popular in Scandinavia by flirting with right-wing extremists with an anti-immigration agenda and, rather than occultism, emphasized a “rationalist” approach to a celebration of freedom and capitalism largely based on the writings of the Russian-born American novelist Ayn Rand (1905-1982). Rand is listed by both LaVey and Breivik among their favorite authors (of course, this is not to suggest that the Church of Satan had anything to do with the Oslo tragedy).” (note last parenthesis). I will change it into “In a way. It is not surprising that Breivig caught the interest even of a member of LaVey’s Church of Satan, although there is no evidence of any direct contact etc.”

Best regards
Dr Massimo Introvigne

 

Again, I will be writing more on the topic, but even with Massimo’s proposed changes he is still “poisoning the well” when it comes to the assessment of Breivik’s motivations. There is no evidence that he was familiar with Satanism as codified by Anton LaVey and represented by the Church of Satan, and even though the parenthetical statement says just that, there is still an implication that the affiliation of someone who found a piece of evidence and produced it freely has an implication on the person who produced that evidence. It may be interesting or even ironic that a priest in the Church of Satan found and made available the manifesto to all comers as an act of “amateur investigation”, but only on a superficial level, as it would have been just as interesting had it been a professional clown or Russian cosmonaut.

An open letter to Massimo Introvigne….

The following letter has been e-mailed and facebook messaged to Introvigne, and I have made and inquiry by twitter as well.

——

Mr. Introvigne,
It appears to me that you have claimed, or it is being interpreted that you’ve stated that I received Breivik’s Manifesto from him, and that he was in direct contact with either myself or someone else from the Church of Satan.
On my personal blog where the manifesto was first posted, and all the original news reporting has made it clear that I found the manifesto on a forum (Stormfront.org) after the terrorist acts had taken place and that I have not ever been in contact with, nor even hear Breivik’s name before the Oslo terrorism.

See:http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/07/23/what_did_the_oslo_killer_want , the author was one of the first people I contacted after I found the manifesto, and he states “The manifesto… was posted on Stormfront.org, a white supremacist website, and discovered by American blogger Kevin I. Slaughter”.

You can see by the date stamps on my personal blog and by my twitter history when I found the document and tried contacting someone about it.

In http://www.thecuttingedgenews.com/index.php?article=52474&pageid&pagename you state “In a way, it is not surprising that Breivik had friends even in LaVey’s Church of Satan.”

What information do you have that Breivik was in contact with myself or another member of the Church of Satan? I have revealed everything I have related to Breivik on my blog, where is your proof of this claim, being repeated time and again?

Thanks,
Kevin I. Slaughter

Massimo Introvigne has never contacted me….

Status

STATEMENT: It appears that Massimo Introvigne is fabricating and spreading unchecked rumors and making unfounded implications. It is being snatched up by various media online and off that are in turn interpreting his implications for their own ends.
It has clearly been stated that I have never heard of or communicated with Breivik before he committed his acts, and that I found the Manifesto while looking for information on a message board.
I am working to clarify what statements have been made by Introvigne and what has been embellished by the media.

Anders Behring Breivik | Is this the e-mail he sent to friends with 2083 Manifesto?

UPDATE, July 28th, 10am – It has started showing up, in the foreign press mostly, that Breivik was in contact with me. It was clearly stated multiple times where and when I found this document online. I had not heard of or been in contact with Breivik or this document before his terrorist actions in Norway. 

—————

4:35PM
Someone forwarded me the following, I don’t have a way to verify as the header information was stripped. As with the manifesto, CAVEAT EMPTOR!

Here is a .zip file of the docx from the email (since I only posted a PDF I’d made earlier:

2083 – A European Declaration of Independence

I don’t know if this it “out” already, but I can’t find it in the mess of links that now refer to him. Either way, here is the supposed email.

Copied and pasted directly from my e-mail, though my “blockquote” style puts things in italics it seems:

Subject: The Islamisation of Western Europe and the status of the European Resistance Movements
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:08:50 +0200

Western European patriot,

I’m hereby sending you my new compendium (3 books); “2083 – A European Declaration of Independence”, in Word 97 format, which includes the following main topics:

1. The ongoing Islamisation of Western Europe

2. The current state of the Western European Resistance Movements (anti-Marxist/anti-Jihad movements)

3. Solutions for Western Europe and how we, the cultural conservative resistance, should move forward in the coming decades

4. And covering all, highly relevant topics including solutions and strategies for all of the 8 different political fronts

 

The compendium/book presents advanced ideological, practical, tactical, organisational and rhetorical solutions and strategies for all patriotic-minded individuals/movements. The book will be of great interest to you whether you are a moderate or a more dedicated cultural conservative/nationalist.

After years of work the first edition of the compendium “2083” is completed. If you have received this e-mail and book, you are either a former Facebook friend or you are the friend of my Facebook friend. If you are concerned for the future of Western Europe you will definitely find the information both interesting and highly relevant.

I have spent several years researching and compiling the information and I have spent most of my hard earned funds in this process (in excess of 300 000 Euros). I do not want any compensation for the work as it is a gift to you, as a fellow patriot.

The content of the compendium truly belongs to everyone and is available to be distributed non-commercially in any way or form. In fact, I ask only one favour of you; I ask that you distribute this book to everyone you know. Please do not think that others will take care of it. Sorry to be blunt, but it does not work out that way. If we, the Western European Resistance, fail or become apathetic, then Western Europe will fall, and your liberties with it…  It is essential and very important that everyone is at least presented with the truth before our systems come crashing down within 2 to 7 decades. So again, I humbly ask you to re-distribute the book to as many patriotic minded individuals as you can. I am 100% certain that the distribution of this compendium to a large portion of European patriots will contribute to ensure our victory in the end. Because within these three books lies the tools required to win the ongoing Western European cultural war, the war against the anti-European hate ideology known as multiculturalism.

Multiculturalism (cultural Marxism/political correctness), as you might know, is the root cause of the ongoing Islamisation of Europe which has resulted in the ongoing Islamic colonisation of Europe through demographic warfare and conquest. This compendium presents the solutions and explains exactly what is required of each and every one of us in the coming decades. Everyone can and should contribute in one way or another, it’s just a matter of will.

I hope you enjoy this compendium. It currently offers the most comprehensive database of solution oriented subjects. As mentioned, I only ask one thing from you; that you distribute this book to your friends and ask them to forward it to “their” friends, especially to individuals who have a patriotic mindset. Please help us and help yourself, your family and friends by contributing to spread the tools which will ensure our victory; for the truth must be known… It is not only our right but also our duty to contribute to preserve our identity, our culture and our national sovereignty by preventing the ongoing Islamisation. There is no Resistance Movement if individuals like us refuse to contribute…

Time is of the essence. We have only a few decades to consolidate a sufficient level of resistance before our major cities are completely demographically overwhelmed by Muslims. Ensuring the successful distribution of this compendium to as many Europeans as humanly possible will significantly contribute to our success. It may be the only way to avoid our present and future dhimmitude (enslavement) under Islamic majority rule in our own countries.

I have been unable to send this compendium to many people, for various reasons, so I truly hope you will be willing to contribute.

This compendium is sent to you in the Word 2007 – docx format. If you do not have MS Word 2007 or newer you may get a “2007 Word Viewer” at no cost at the main Microsoft site or just get a trial version.

 

Opening a docx file

Microsoft introduced the .docx  file format in its 2007 Office and Word applications and wants it to replace the commonly used doc format. The problem with the change from doc to docx is that many users are still working with prior versions of Word (XP in particular) or no Microsoft product at all and face the problem that they can’t load the docx file because it is not supported in their application.

 

Older versions of Microsoft Office or Microsoft Word:

Older versions such as Office XP do not support the docx format because it was not known when they were developed and sold. A simple way to read docx and xlsx files is to select one of the following options:

 

1. For Word XP or older versions – install the Microsoft Compatibility Pack which adds support for the new file formats, or;

2. Download Word 97 viewer or newer, or;

3. You can use the Open XML Translator for Open Office to be able to read and edit docx files with Open Office, or;

4. The free online docx converter lets you convert docx documents. This is a pretty good solution if you don’t want to install the previously mentioned add-ons. Remember, gaining access to this compendium will be well worth your time!

 

For translation from English to another language I would recommend the Google translation engine as a short term solution.

Sincere and patriotic regards,

Andrew Berwick, London, England – 2011

 

Justiciar Knight Commander for Knights Templar Europe and one of several leaders of the National and pan-European Patriotic Resistance Movement

With the assistance from brothers and sisters in England, France, Germany, Sweden, Austria, Italy, Spain, Finland, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, the US etc.