“What is Satanic” and art in Detroit…

I’ve posted a short excerpt from my lecture on Wednesday, and made a post on Underworld Amusements. Please go there to view the video and see a few related photos.

Here I will post  a few photos from the Detroit Institute of Arts. I was very impressed with the collection, and was able to spend quite a few hours there yesterday. I had used up nearly all of my 16 gig memory card with video from the lecture, so I was using my backup 1 gig card forcing me to be very selective in taking photos. Either way, these are some of the works that I wanted to look at again when I got home….

Related posts:

  1. audio Q&A from Satanism lecture…
  2. YouTube :: Stephen Kasner on Objective Measures of Art
  3. “Satanic” Joke and Halloween debauch..
  4. Sample video of lecture on Satanism – Lex Talionis
  5. First of the YouTube series: Peter H. Gilmore on Art and Discrimination
  • Annis Isbell

    Does Satan inspire beautiful art?  Do Knights fight for Satan?  Why are Satan and his demons depicted as ugly and as crushing the life out of people if Satan represents life as you said in your lecture?

    Why have we evolved with a need for a higher power?  Every culture on Earth down thur history has had creation myths.  Even those who don’t believe in God are obsessed with Him and in an effort to get away from Him turn to Satan.  Which doesn’t make much sense because if you believe in Satan then you believe in God.

    Did anyone at this meeting “Separation of Church and State” talk about jews in government?

    • http://www.kevinislaughter.com/ Kevin I. Slaughter

      I’m really not sure why every post you make here ends up talking about Jews. Here… read this: 
      http://www.kevinislaughter.com/2008/from-chapter-1-of-a-jew-in-love-by-ben-hecht/ 

      • Annis Isbell

        I don’t wish to read that.   I wish to discuss “The Separation of Church and State” and your speech.  Our forefathers knew the power that the church had in Europe and about the divine right of kings and they wished for us to be free from that. 

        They certainly did not intend that Christians should not be allowed in government.  They also didn’t intend for our central government to have the power that it now takes for itself largely to serve the interests of jews at our expense.  If jews were not controlling our government and media we certainly would never have been attacked by Arabs nor would we have gone to war with them.

        If jews were not controlling our government we wouldn’t be bringing in hordes of non Whites in our country who will displace us in a few generations.

        We would not be claiming that israel has a right to exist while acting as though Palestine and Western civilization have no such rights.  The people who created civilization are not that big of fools.

        jews set themselves up to define and interpret what our forefathers intended in order to get Christians out of our own government.  My question is legitimate.

        Was there any discussion regarding the power that jews have in our government?  Was there any discussion of the power that israel has in our government?  Or was it merely an effort to convince people that Christians are stupid as well as evil.  Stupid for believing in a God and evil for ever opposing the economic and political machinations of the jew?

        • http://www.kevinislaughter.com/ Kevin I. Slaughter


          They certainly did not intend that Christians should not be allowed in government.”

          Who, exactly, is saying that Christians cannot be part of the government?

          • Annis Isbell

            Did not you and others speak before students at an Indiana college about “separation of church and state”?

          • http://www.kevinislaughter.com/ Kevin I. Slaughter

            You are obviously confused about what that phrase means. It does not suggest that people who are religious cannot hold office.

            From Wikipedia:

            The concept of the separation of church and state refers to the distance in the relationship between organized religion and the nation state. The term is an offshoot of the phrase, “wall of separation between church and state,” as written in Thomas Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptist Association in 1802. The original text reads: “… I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.” Jefferson reflected his frequent speaking theme that the government is not to interfere with religion.[1] The phrase was quoted by the United States Supreme Court first in 1878, and then in a series of cases starting in 1947. The phrase “separation of church and state” itself does not appear in the United States Constitution. The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Prior to 1947, however, these provisions were not considered to apply at the state level; indeed in the 1870s and 1890s unsuccessful attempts were made to amend the constitution to accomplish this, but it was accomplished by judicial decision in 1947.

            Please see this for more:
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_church_and_state 

          • Annis Isbell

            I am not interested in what the founding fathers said or intended.  I’m interesting in whether during this event if you discussed getting Christians out of government?  If you discussed getting jews out of government?

            Can you not answer direct questions with direct answers please?

  • Annis Isbell

    Regarding “What is Satanic”.  I believe that Christianity played a major role in the success of Nordic people and the creation of Western civilization.  In the age of science and reason it is difficult to believe that a person needs to be saved by the blood of Jesus or that there would even be a concept such as sin. 

    Its not rational to expect a lion to not kill and eat since that is its nature.  It doesn’t seem reasonable that humans should have to repent or be held accountable for our natures.

    Nevertheless I see the people who obsessively attack religion as being juvenile and would be shock jocks.  The situation demands nothing more than common sense and a little cultural literacy.  We really shouldn’t have to go around asking Christians “you really believe that stuff”.  It should be assumed that educated people think a certain way.  It is known by society and accepted as common sense.

    However the problem is that we did evolve with a need for a higher power.  Its a mysterious part of our nature.  As the poet said, consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds.  Even rational minds can turn to God in a time of need, knowing that they don’t believe the Adam and Eve myth or that Jesus was a Trinity.

    When people ridicule and belittle religious people it is probably because they were lucky to be born to parents that didn’t abuse them and also provided them with lots of love, proper nutrition and who also were blessed by genes that gave them good minds.

    Do you have scorn for the parents who pray to God for their child that is dying with leukemia and the doctors tell them there is no hope?  Would you laugh at the boys who were molested by Sandusky if they sought God’s help to heal their minds and help them adjust and have some sort of normal life like boys who never got molested?

    The Bible says we shouldn’t judge others.  An Indian proverb says that you should walk a mile in someone else’s shoe before we judge them.

    I think it is appropriate to discuss and question things like religion.  But I don’t think it is appropriate to ridicule the belief of others.  I also don’t think its appropriate for jews to play such a major role in what I perceive to be the persecution of Christianity.  They whine and cry in their beer if anyone looks crosseyed at them but they sure take license to attack other religions. 

    They are spilling our Christian children’s blood killing Muslims so if any religion should come under scrutiny its judaism.  But while jews are quick to see the faults of others they never turn a critical eye upon themselves or ever take any accountability for the fact that they are and have been historically universally hated.  Its always someone’s else’s fault.  They whine about the holocaust but if it were as horrible as they claim it makes me wonder what people would have to do to be rid of them.

    Irving Berlin wrote White Christmas in order to take Christ out and make it a winter holiday for everyone.  A trickster jew.  Today Harold Myerson who writes for the NYT writes articles about it and Robert Reich puts them on his website and they brag about it.

    Robert Reich is the same jew who testified before “our” congress that White men shouldn’t get any of the stimulus jobs even though White men were paying for them.

    It seems to me that Christian values worked very well for our people and all of Western civilization and any discussion of its history should be done with respect for it and for the people who practiced it or still believe in it.

    I think it is suicidal for the West and for Nordic people if we allow others to come into our countries and tear down and remake everything in their image.  Some other races are too dumb to realize they are killing the golden goose.  On the other hand some people know exactly what they are doing.

    • http://www.kevinislaughter.com/ Kevin I. Slaughter

      You declined to reply to my comment below, and I’m reading your ranting and wondering “why are they here”?

      Why are you on my site? Is there something here of interest to you?
      Your rants have nothing to do with the blog post they’re attached to.

  • Annis Isbell

    Kevin – when I asked if you were jewish based upon the content here you lectured me and said I’m obsessed with jews.  I wonder why you didn’t respond by saying something like “oh gee, that’s very flattering but I’m not jewish”?  Why did you immediately think you needed to come to the defense of the jew religion and its members?

    You are critical of religion and nobody takes you to task and suggests you read the New Testament because Jesus loves you.  Nobody suggests you read the history of Christian persecution as a way of condemning your criticisms.  For crying out loud you can even discuss and make fun of Christians at a college and in public.

     I say something critical of jews and you act as though we’re never supposed to say negative things in life about others.  You may not worship God but you sure think highly of jews.

    Our children are taught in our public schools that Jesus is divisive and are encouraged to deny Him.  Yet they are not allowed to deny The Holocaust which is spelled with caps.  Isn’t there something wrong with that? 

    If its ok to ridicule and question religion why is it not ok to question The Holocaust?

    • http://www.kevinislaughter.com/ Kevin I. Slaughter

      Please quote me where I

      a) defend jews,
      b) state or imply they cannot be criticized,
      c) claim that it’s not okay to question the holocaust.

      • Annis Isbell

        At that time I was still childish enough to try to make
        the madness of their doctrine clear to them; in my little circle I
        talked my tongue sore and my throat hoarse, thinking I would inevitably
        succeed in convincing them how ruinous their Marxist madness was; but
        what I accomplished was often the opposite. It seemed as though their
        increased understanding of the destructive effects of Social Democratic
        theories and their results only reinforced their determination.

        The more I argued with them, the better I came to know
        their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary,
        and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply
        played stupid. If all this didn’t help, they pretended not to
        understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry,
        quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related
        to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground
        and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about.

        Whenever
        you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a
        jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but
        in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of
        these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he
        couldn’t help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at
        least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew
        had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his
        same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if
        indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn’t remember a
        thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the
        previous day.

        • http://www.kevinislaughter.com/ Kevin I. Slaughter

          I didn’t write that.

          • Annis Isbell

            It was written by Adolph Hitler.

          • http://www.kevinislaughter.com/ Kevin I. Slaughter

            Please quote me where I a) defend jews, b) state or imply they cannot be criticized, c) claim that it’s not okay to question the holocaust.

  • http://www.kevinislaughter.com/ Kevin I. Slaughter

    Annis, so… You capitalize the “c” in “Christian”, you capitalize the “t” and “h” in “The Holocaust”, you capitalize the “j” in Jesus, but you never seem to capitalize the “j” in “Jewish”… is there a reason for that? It certainly seems intentional.

    • Annis Isbell

      I have contempt for jews.

      • http://www.kevinislaughter.com/ Kevin I. Slaughter

        Well there ya go… straight forward response…

  • Annis Isbell

    By their works you know them.

    No wonder jews don’t like Jesus.

    • http://www.kevinislaughter.com/ Kevin I. Slaughter

      You claim I can’t answer a simple question, but you’ve either dodged or digressed from answering nearly all of mine.

      • Annis Isbell

        The first time I ever attempted to debate jews was at my local online newspaper.  They were celebrating and exchanging recipes about the holiday that comes around the same time as Christmas.

        I told them I would try the recipe but I was jealous and felt left out.

        Somebody said they had an appointment but would get back to me.  Of course they always had something that had to be done and a debate never happened.

        That scenario has repeated many times.  The last time was only about a week ago at a jew website where they talked about events, books etc.  It didn’t matter what I said about the things they were doing they would not debate anything.

        This strategy must have developed over time as the jew could never justify his actions nor refute any accusations. Such natural liars.

        The only thing I can say about that is that I’m glad I’m not jewish.  I would hate to be like that.  

    • http://www.kevinislaughter.com/ Kevin I. Slaughter

      Please quote me where I 

      a) defend jews, 
      b) state or imply they cannot be criticized, 
      c) claim that it’s not okay to question the holocaust.

  • Annis Isbell

    Given the history of the jews I think there is something wrong with the wiring in their brains.  Ted Bundy had a very high IQ and other serial killers as well.  Yet the wiring in their brains was so off that they couldn’t help but kill people.

    jews want to destroy Western civilization so they can have a jew world order.  They want to get rid of non jewish White people.  Even though we have never done anything to them.  It is always the jew who is a parasitic cancer upon us and others.

    They have never changed over hundreds of years which means that their behavior is bred in their bones, wired in their brains and in their DNA.

    • http://www.kevinislaughter.com/ Kevin I. Slaughter

      So, do you believe there is a disproportionate number of Jews who are serial killers? That would really be the only way that makes any sense…

      • Annis Isbell

        No it isn’t.  jews can have twisted brains and not be out right serial killers in the sense we use that term.

  • Annis Isbell

    At first I thought some of the stuff you posted was interesting so I signed up for your feed.  Then it just got dark and weird.  Its like stuff jews are into that nobody else wants to even think about.

    • http://www.kevinislaughter.com/ Kevin I. Slaughter

      Well, it’s a mix of stuff… this is my personal site, not a group blog with a single subject or purpose. It’s ALWAYS been dark and weird and about stuff that nobody else wants to even think about.

      • Annis Isbell

        Don’t you think its interesting that I thought you were jewish because of that

        • http://www.kevinislaughter.com/ Kevin I. Slaughter

          No, I don’t.

  • Annis Isbell

    You couldn’t even be happy in a country of your own.  goodbye kevin

  • Jims713

    Who is Annis Isbell?

    • http://www.kevinislaughter.com/ Kevin I. Slaughter

      Some random person from teh interwebs…. and when I say random, I mean “tha joooos!”

  • Pingback: WSU SSA Separation of Church and State Week …and what to do and what not to do when planning events « smartassopium